Thursday 20 February 2014

Five things I Learned from the Decoda Literacy Conference

Written by: Samra Admasu
I recently attended my first Decoda (BC’s literacy network) conference which was in Richmond BC this year. I did not know what to expect. My first impression was of a strong sense of community in the literacy field. It felt like a reunion among participants. I witnessed many friendly interactions between participants who knew each other or who’d heard about each other’s organization. But Decoda also provided a warm, welcoming environment for those who were new to the literacy community like me.
The Adult Literacy Research Institute (ALRI) held a booth with information about our work.  My role was to inform people about who we are and what we do. In addition to presenting ALRI information, I also attended a number of sessions throughout the two-day conference. As part of a research team my other objective was to note my experience at the event from the perspective of a person who is relatively new to the literacy field. So here are my notes from my experience and the sessions I attended, or five things I learned from the Decoda Literacy Conference:
1. If there is a will there is a way.  Perry Smith and Sharon Crowley from the Literacy Matters Association of Abbotsford discussed the process of creating an Aboriginal community library. The association develops programs that focus on adult and Aboriginal literacy.  In partnership with community members they identified a need to increase the literacy potential of Aboriginal families in the community because very few Aboriginal families were utilizing library services in Abbotsford. As a result of partnerships and community support, the Ray and Millie Silver Aboriginal Library was created to provide Aboriginal literacy resources to the community. Many Aboriginal families now come to the library with much interest to the variety of resources available. The initiative demonstrates how a community can work together to address their own needs. 
2. Rob and duplicate.  The Tri-Cities Early Childhood Development (ECD) committee presented a number of successful literacy initiatives driven by community collaboration.  The committee aims to create a sense of community by addressing and removing barriers experienced within the community. One of their initiatives was to create a community resource map that provides a list of locations of literacy programs, support, and information for adult learners and families.
Another initiative was Family Learn and Play which is an initiative by the school district and the local Coquitlam Centre mall. They hold regular craft and stories events at the mall where a librarian also volunteers to host a story-reading session.
The session illustrated how collaborating with the community helps individuals grow collectively and how collaboration helps to develop programs that address the community’s needs. The Tri-Cities ECD committee presented these initiatives to inspire other programs in the hopes that we share these ideas—that we “rob and duplicate” —that we take what works elsewhere and reproduce it in our own communities.
3. Literacy can save your life. WorkSafe BC held an informative session discussing the link between safety and literacy. They presented resources available for young and vulnerable workers to understand their rights as workers. When employees are misinformed about their rights they are at higher risk for injury, they lack stable employment, and can expect low wages. The organization emphasized the importance of employees fully understanding workplace safety policies and procedures.
4. Knowledge is wealth.  The Family Services of Greater Vancouver held a session on their financial literacy program. They assist those who do not have access to financial information and they teach how to manage money. The aim of the program is to increase confidence and knowledge in daily money management. They hope to empower individuals by providing tools for and knowledge of financial literacy.
5. Legalese can be translated free of charge.  The Legal Services Society of BC presented a range of resources that provide legal information and services to the public. Their aim is to bridge the gap between the community and the legal system. For example, Clicklaw is a great site where you can find current information on law and legal services. The information is delivered in plain non-legal terminology which makes it easier for people to access and understand the information they discover. 
The Decoda literacy conference was a great experience and I hope to attend next year. Click here to see Flickr photostream from the event provided by Decoda.  


Decoda Literacy Library

Posters of inspirational quotes were spread throughout the conference hall. 


Live Twitterfeed showcased in the main conference room.

Candace Witkowskyj at the ALRI booth.


Keynote speaker Dr. Justin Davis presented a session on neuroscience research and the basics of the brain.



Wednesday 19 February 2014

Leadership

I went to a leadership academy this past June and we watched this movie.  It is a classic called "12 Angry Men" starring Henry Fonda.  The movie is simple and yet has a complex treatment of important themes related to leadership. In the movie, a jury must decide the outcome of a murder trial that at first seems straightforward with the defendant guilty.  However, the mood and opinion of the jury changes as one member, refuses to just sign off without examining the evidence.  Be sure to enjoy and share your thoughts on what it reveals about leadership, here on the blog.

Bow Valley College Biology 30/ Human Science Cadaver Lab - Allison Burstrom & Heather Skrapec (Students)

            As Biology 30 students currently attending Bow Valley College, we were offered the rewarding opportunity to attend the Post Mortem Lab at the Foothills Hospital. The two hour lab consisted of a guided explanation of five different cadavers, each with their own unique characteristics and access to a specimen gallery. The most intriguing subject we examined had a condition known as Situs Inversus, where the organs of the body are mirrored perfectly in contrast to someone without this abnormality. For example, the heart of this man was situated on the right side of his chest cavity, as opposed to its normal place on the left. We were also shown a horseshoe kidney, another very fascinating organ where the kidneys did not split during fetal development. As a result it is unusually larger than normal and presents two renal pelvises instead of one.
Not only was this experience engaging in its presentation, the hands-on aspect promoted a more intimate involvement from the students. We were encouraged to inspect the cadavers which gave us the opportunity to test our knowledge and further our understanding of human physiology. Particularly in the third cadaver, the female subject had been divided by a sagittal incision through her body. This gave us the ability to clearly view the pathways of her internal organs. One of the most awe inspiring realities we took away from this cadaver was the size of a human uterus. We were amazed by how small it was within the body in comparison to pictures in the textbooks we study from. This new understanding is one of many aspects that add significant value to the Post Mortem Lab.
Following the examination of the cadavers, we were brought into the specimen gallery. This room was filled with various organs that presented different conditions and diseases. This section of the lab was critical as we are presently studying some of these disorders and found it extremely educational to be able to view them first-hand.
Overall, this once in a life time chance was truly memorable. With the knowledge we gained through this experience, we are extremely excited to carry on our careers in the medical field. We are thankful to both the Foothills Hospital and Bow Valley College for providing this opportunity.

Thursday 13 February 2014

Share the Wealth: What a Great Day!

I presented with Brenda Thomas, Laura Slade, Lusine Harutyunyan, and Jenny Tzanakos on Media Curation. Media curation is the search for well developed, high quality educational videos that are freely available online. In the workshop, the participants created a YouTube channel with personalized playlists to organize their instructional videos.

If you missed the workshop and would like to create your own YouTube channel, you can use the information on the Foundational Learning website to guide you:


I also attended Blueprint 2.0 presented by Maureen Stewart, Karlie Wimble, and Karim Jaber. In the workshop, Maureen deconstructed the components of the science, math, and ELA blueprints. At the end of the workshop, all the instructors knew how to build a valid and reliable exam.

If you want to know more about blueprints, visit:






Tuesday 11 February 2014

Celebrating Alberta’s Deborah Morgan, Phyllis Steeves, and Lorene Anderson: Three Literacy Cartographers Mapping the Way

Latest piece from Stories from the Field
Article Written by Sandi Loschnig

Stories from the Field has been a year-long, informal professional-development project that shares literacy practitioners’ stories of innovations, successes, and challenges working in the adult literacy field in Alberta. Because this is the last story in the initial phase of this project, it’s fitting that it celebrates three extraordinary women. In their own way, each is a literacy cartographer charting new and innovative landscapes in adult literacy in Alberta.
Grassroots to technology — Deborah Morgan has grown programs with hope, heart, and skill.
photo 3 (1)Literacy practitioner Deborah Morgan’s work spaces have included a tiny office, a kitchen table, and on-line learning over the past twenty-seven years but the work has rippled out to change the lives of a wide range of people. It all started in 1986, when Deborah accepted a position as the coordinator of the new Camrose Adult Read and Write Program. The program was among the first twenty-five adult literacy programs in Alberta. Contracted to work twenty hours a week for $9.00 an hour, with a total budget of $12,000 a year, her job was to set up an office, recruit and train volunteers to tutor adult literacy students, assess and match students with tutors, keep records, and raise awareness in the community about literacy issues (Morgan 1992, i). This was no small task! New to the literacy field, she hit the ground running.
What I didn’t know academically, I tried to make up for in enthusiasm and hope. And I had a lot of help … The strongest and most valuable support I received for the work I was trying to do was from other literacy workers in the province who were dealing with similar joys and frustrations as they faced the challenges of their own literacy work. (Morgan 1992, ii)
Eventually, Deborah became a member of the Literacy Coordinators of Alberta (LCA) and the Alberta Association for Adult Literacy. Part of this work included managing the LCA’s Regional Resource People Project. As her work expanded she met more and more literacy coordinators from all over the province, hearing and sharing stories about literacy work. She felt that the development of grassroots community-based volunteer-tutor literacy programs needed to be recognized and documented as a piece of our literacy history. From this seed, the Opening Doors book took root.
Beginning in the fall of 1990 and over the next year, Deborah travelled over 7,000 kilometres by car, plane, and bus to visit forty-two communities in Alberta. She completed eighty-eight interviews with volunteer and paid tutors, literacy coordinators, literacy classroom instructors, and some administrators (Morgan 1992, iv).
I wrote Opening Doors because I was so intrigued by all the stories and experiences that literacy workers talked about and felt they needed to be honoured, given a voice. I wanted people to hear about and recognize the amazing work that was going on in little communities throughout Alberta. (Personal interview, 2013)
Her work was just beginning. In 1993, Deborah was introduced to a group of women on government assistance who had been referred by their social worker. The worker considered them to be “severely employment disadvantaged.” As Deborah recalls from that introduction, “years of poverty, abuse and getting bumped around in the system had left the women feeling bruised and afraid. The social worker didn’t hold out much hope for my being able to make a difference in the lives of these women, but when I met the women, I liked them immediately” (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 8).
Deborah and the women met once a week in her kitchen, getting to know one another and developing trust. With Deborah’s support, they came up with a proposal for a program that “would honour the personal and learning needs of women who had been scarred by the debilitating effects of physical, emotional, and/or substance abuse. The women wanted to call the program ‘Chapters’, because they were looking forward to a new chapter in their lives” (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 8). After almost another year of meetings and presentations, they secured funding and the Chapters program began.
In the winter of 1994, twelve women began meeting in an upstairs classroom of an old building in downtown Camrose. This is how Deborah described her approach to facilitating such a diverse group of women:
Learning has to feel safe so creating a safe environment is really important. And part of that safe environment is acceptance. People have to feel they belong in this group — that they are worthy of being in this group. They need to feel they are equal contributors — that they have skills that they can share with one another and with the instructor. (Personal interview, 2013)
Writing was a key activity in the Chapters program. Deborah used a “writing from the heart” approach (which initially puts aside concerns about spelling and grammar). Even though their literacy skills ranged from very basic to a grade 8 level, the women wrote stories about their thoughts and experiences. They explored ideas, feelings, personal conflicts, and challenges. Eventually they produced seven publications that were enthusiastically received locally, provincially, and nationally (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 18).
Three years later when funding ran out and the Chapters program came to an end, Deborah and the women decided to put together a handbook documenting their writing experiences/exercises as part of the project’s final report.
One of the Chapters students surprised herself one day when she finished doing some writing about the loss of her marriage. She looked up suddenly and said “I don’t like talking about this stuff, but it sure feels good to write about it. I feel like I’m writing out loud instead of talking out loud! (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 21)
This work led to the development of the Write to Learn project in 1998. This project was designed to find out how literacy workers were teaching writing in their programs. It became clear that people wanted “more professional development opportunities and better resources to help them improve their practice and approach to teaching writing” (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 28).And as they say, the rest is history. The Chapters handbook was printed and called Writing Out Loud. The women helped to assemble one hundred binders which were distributed to volunteer tutor programs throughout Alberta. This turned into a second, third, and fourth printing as literacy workers across Canada wanted a copy of the resource. After the women sold over a thousand copies in binder form, Grassroots Press in Edmonton agreed to publish and promote a book version of Writing Out Loud as a professional educational resource in their catalogue. Soon practitioners in the United States wanted to purchase the book. It was evident that practitioners across Canada and internationally wanted and needed resources to help them teach writing.
In 1999, Deborah and three students from the Chapters program — Sharron Szott, Barb McTavish, and Alice Kneeland — travelled across Canada teaching what they called “Fearless Writing” workshops. By December, 2000, they had delivered forty-seven workshops/presentations in eighteen cities in eight provinces/territories to approximately 980 men and women (582 instructors and 398 students) (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 29).
The project was gaining momentum. Programs around the country were requesting workshops and training. The group needed to find a way to train literacy workers from regions across Canada as Writing Out Loud instructors. Creating a distance education course seemed to be the answer (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 36).
In November 2000, twenty-eight literacy workers from across Canada piloted the first Writing Out Loud On-line Instructor Training. The work included personal reading and on-line participation using conferencing software (Morgan and Twiss 2010, 41). Literacy practitioners had discovered on-line training and there was no turning back.
In the ensuing years, Deborah continued her work developing numerous on-line learning and professional development initiatives for literacy practitioners. This work culminated in her involvement in a nationwide project called Getting Online: Distance Education Promising Practices for Canadian Literacy Practitioners (the GO Project). The two-year project (2007-2009) was designed to research trends, technologies, and promising practices in on-line and distance learning in the literacy field in Canada. The project included A Research Report on Online Learning for Canadian Literacy Practitioners, A Promising Practices Manual, an on-line course, and self-directed training modules on the GO website.
In addition to Deborah’s project work, she served as president of both the Literacy Coordinators of Alberta and the Alberta Association of Adult Literacy (precursors to the provincial literacy association, Literacy Alberta).This past year, Deborah came out of retirement to serve as a mentor in the Integrating Foundational Learning Project. This work involved helping program staff at the Calgary chapter of the Multiple Sclerosis Society understand what literacy and essential skills their clients needed to make better use of the society’s programs and educational materials.
Teacher, mentor, networker, researcher, writer, and collaborator—with hope, heart, and skill, Deborah Morgan continues to be involved in literacy work from her home in Camrose, Alberta.
Maverick literacy practitioner and scholar Phyllis Steeves is challenging the current way of defining Aboriginal literacy.
PhyllisS_PhotoWhen Phyllis Steeves talks about her learning journey, she speaks about “the merging of personal, professional, and academic experiences” that brought her to her current work. Phyllis describes herself as “a Cree-Metis woman with strong roots in the community of Lac Ste. Anne, Alberta.” Lac Ste. Anne is an annual destination for thousands of Aboriginal peoples who make a pilgrimage to the lake for healing and spiritual rejuvenation. Phyllis also calls herself a mother, grandmother, sister, friend, and a daughter, although her parents have both passed away.
Phyllis’s introduction to the formal literacy world came through her work with the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (MNA) in the early 1990s. There, she created an annotated bibliography of Metis-specific literacy materials, and later coordinated a literacy program. Like many practitioners I spoke to, Phyllis didn’t plan on being a literacy coordinator — she fell into it. The work simply resonated with who she was. During this time she began reflecting on what literacy meant for her, as a Cree Metis, and what it might mean for other Aboriginal peoples.
Following her work at the MNA, Phyllis went back to school, earning certificates (with distinction) in non-profit agency management, volunteer management, and fundraising management at MacEwan University. Her heart was in working for a non-profit organization and she started working for a progressive, inner-city adult literacy association, The Learning Centre Literacy Association in Edmonton. This was the beginning of over ten years’ work in mainstream literacy.
While working for this association, Phyllis was granted a ten-month sabbatical, a rare opportunity in the non-profit field. She chose to pursue a master’s degree in International Peace Studies at Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland. Wanting a change, Phyllis planned to study topics other than literacy or issues related to Aboriginal peoples. Despite her plans to try something new, she discovered that “you can take the woman out of the country, but you can’t take the country out of the woman.” Her master’s thesis explored  “Cultural Genocide Practices: A Case Study of Canada’s Metis” (Steeves 2003). This work laid part of the foundation for her future thinking and research.
Phyllis returned to Canada and resumed working at The Learning Centre Literacy Association. She continued to seriously think about the various definitions of literacy and what their impact was on Aboriginal peoples. Literacy as a concept was expanding and becoming ever more inclusive. For example, the terms computer literacy, financial literacy, and health literacy (along with their corresponding skill sets) were now commonly used. This concept included Aboriginal literacy as a construct (Steeves 2010, 3).
In 2005, she sought a doctorate program where she would have an opportunity to work with Indigenous scholars. She found one in her own backyard: the Indigenous Peoples’ Education program in the Department of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Alberta. She proceeded to explore the ideas and concepts that she had been musing on for so many years in her doctorate.
“The concept of Aboriginal literacy now encompassed principles of instruction and the ways of being and knowing of Aboriginal peoples” (Steeves 2010, 3). Phyllis wondered whether this was a positive or negative development. “I began to wonder how my grandchildren might be impacted by this inclusion of Aboriginal peoples’ ways of being and knowing under the powerful construct of ‘literacy’ as defined by the dominant society” (Steeves 2010, 4).
The resulting dissertation was called “Literacy: Genocide’s Silken Instrument. The title is powerful, shocking, and amazingly apt. It is a potent treatise on the concept of literacy. Using the metaphor of an orb spider spinning its intricate web, it illustrates how “Aboriginal peoples’ ways of knowing and being have made contact with and become entwined within the concept of literacy” (Steeves 2010, 116). Steeves explores “the actions/events/discourses that facilitated creation of a concept which reframes Aboriginal peoples’ ways of knowing and being under a Eurocentric construct: the concept of Aboriginal literacy” (Steeves 2010, abstract). She suggests that Aboriginal peoples’ distinct ways of being and knowing are at risk of being erased and lost within these expanding definitions of literacy.
Currently, Phyllis is an assistant professor teaching education students (future teachers) at the University of Calgary. She admits that she has been stunned by many students’ lack of knowledge and awareness of Aboriginal peoples’ history and ways of being, and she is working to change that. “Recently teaching student teachers, I was saddened by the lack of knowledge of the history, hardships, and successes of Aboriginal peoples. Ignorance is still the norm. The good news is this is slowly changing.” (personal interview, 2014)
She is also project lead on the Alberta Adult Assessment Framework for Aboriginal Peoples project at Bow Valley College. Team members are working to create an English-language, user-friendly self-assessment model that will be developed through engagement with Aboriginal adults in urban and rural locations.
Like the spider weaving a web, there is a constant thread weaving through Phyllis Steeves’s work. She strives to bring a contextual framework that values Aboriginal peoples’ history, culture, and ways of knowing and being to the table. Within that framework, she is simultaneously defining herself and challenging us to join her in critically reflecting on the meaning and impact — real and potential — of the concept of Aboriginal literacy. “Construction of a new web is imminent, its location and architecture is, however, yet to be determined” (Steeves 2010, 117).
Lorene Anderson —Bringing breadth and depth to adult literacy in Alberta
My approach to adult learning is that it encompasses everything from working with people with low levels of literacy to working with people who are in the workplace who may not have quite as low levels of literacy but want to improve their skills. I think that if you don’t have the skills to change your world, you don’t look at your world to see where it can be changed. (personal interview, 2013)
LoreneAWhen someone calls Lorene Anderson an adult literacy specialist, she seems genuinely surprised. She is a modest woman who feels uncomfortable blowing her own horn. As she said in a recent conversation, “I’m not sure that I’ve contributed to the adult literacy field as much as it has contributed to me.” But her education and literacy career, which started thirty years ago in a grade 1 classroom, tells a bigger story.
Although Lorene enjoyed teaching children and honed many of her skills in the school system, she discovered early on that she was passionate about teaching adults. “When you’re teaching adults they’re not in your classroom unless they’re ready to learn. They are there because they need to be.”
In 1990 she received a degree in linguistics (a second undergraduate degree) and began teaching English as a second language (ESL) at Bow Valley College. A few years later she completed a master’s in education with a focus on adult education. After teaching ESL for almost a decade, Lorene decided to hang out her shingle as an independent consultant specializing in English as an additional language, workplace essential skills, and adult literacy.
One of her first projects was developing the ESL Rural Routes initiative with Dawn Seabrook de Vargas in 2000. ESL Rural Routes provides support and capacity-building services to adult ESL providers in rural and small urban communities throughout Alberta. The program especially benefits Community Adult Learning Councils (CALCS) and Volunteer Tutor Adult Learning Services (VTALS)  because they provide front-line services supporting newcomers. Rural Routes services include training, workshops, and mentorships by ESL consultants and intercultural specialists. Although Lorene’s involvement ended in 2012, the initiative is still going strong under the auspices of NorQuest College.
During the first year of developing Rural Routes, Lorene again teamed up with Seabrook de Vargas to develop and write an ESL Resource Package for Alberta Communities (ERPAC). The resource package helps new and experienced instructors to plan and deliver effective English-as-a-second-language programming. It is comprehensive, providing information on curriculum development, good practice, adult learning principles, learning styles, cultural diversity, Canadian Language Benchmarks, assessment, instructional practices, and resources.
During these busy years, Lorene completed the Essential Skills Profiler Training and began consulting for Alberta Workforce Essential Skills (AWES). Her education and experience were a natural fit for the organization. Conducting learning needs assessments, developing a corresponding curriculum using workplace materials, and facilitating workers’ upgrading and training within the essential skills framework were an integral part of her work. One of her many projects for AWES was Forging Links, a social sector case study. This project involved partnering with many different agencies and organizations to raise awareness and usage of Workplace Essential Skills (WES) in Alberta and across Canada.
In 2007, Lorene joined the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) registry of experts. As part of her role there she conducted workshops on both their CLB resources and their essential skills resources. She also worked with a team to develop, edit, and pilot various resources.
More recently, in 2011-2012, Lorene worked as the workplace essential skills consultant on the Brighter Futures Project: Building on Family Literacy Programs by Incorporating Essential Skills, an initiative for the Taber and District Community Adult Learning Association. The project involved research, assessment, evaluation, and curriculum development.
Lorene shows no signs of slowing down. Her current consulting projects include Alberta Reading Benchmarks , Learner Progression Measures and Supporting Practice Engagement, WriteForward, and Promising Practices for Literacy and Essential Skills Programs and Services in Alberta. She also sits on the board of directors for Calgary Learns, a granting agency that supports foundational learning for adults.
I think that what I bring to most projects is a broad background with many types of learners (ESL, ESL literacy, literacy, and workplace), different providers (rural, urban, college, volunteer, small, large) and different types of instructors (professionally trained to volunteers with very little training). (Personal conversation, 2014)
Although Lorene sums up her skills and experience in her usual modest way, the depth and breadth of her work speaks for her. She is indeed a literacy cartographer mapping the way for practitioners working in the English as an additional language, adult literacy, and workplace essential skills fields in Alberta.
References and Resources
Alberta Reading Benchmarks Project. Bow Valley College. http://albertareadingbenchmarks.wordpress.com/
Alberta Workforce Essential Skills. 2007. Social Sector Study: Forging Linkshttp://www.awes.ca/uploads/1/0/8/8/10881793/social_sector_case_study.pdf
Alberta Workforce Essential Skills Society (AWES). http://www.awes.ca/
Anderson, Lorene, and Dawn Seabrook de Vargas. 2003. ESL Resource Package for Alberta Communities (ERPAC). Calgary, Alberta: Bow Valley College.    http://www.norquest.ca/NorquestCollege/media/pdf/educationalresources/ERPAC-via-NorQuest-College.pdf
Anderson, Lorene, Christine Bates, Jane Brenner, Colleen Carey, Jonna Grad, Donna Hamilton, et al. 2012. Brighter Futures Project: Building on Family Literacy Program by Incorporating Essential Skills. Taber and District Community Adult Learning Association. http://en.copian.ca/library/learning/oles/brighter/brighter.pdf
Best, Lynn, Joanne Kaattari, Deborah Morgan, Vicki Trottier, and Diana Twiss. 2008. Getting Online The GO Project: A Research Report on Online Learning for Canadian Literacy Practitioners. Retrieved from http://en.copian.ca/library/research/goreport/goreport.pdf
Best, Lynn, Joanne Kaattari, Deborah Morgan, Vicki Trottier, and Diana Twiss. 2009. Bridging Distance: Promising Practices in Online Learning in the Canadian Literacy Community. Retrieved from    http://en.copian.ca/library/research/bridgingdistance/bridgingdistance.pdf
Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. http://www.language.ca/
Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. 2005. Relating Canadian Language Benchmarks to Essential Skills: A Comparative Framework. http://en.copian.ca/library/research/rclbes-e/cover.htm
ESL Rural Routes. ESL resources, workshops, mentorships. http://eslruralroutes.norquest.ca/
Lac Ste. Anne Pilgrimage. http://www.lsap.ca/
Literacy Alberta. Promising Practices for Literacy and Essential Skills Programs and Services in Alberta. http://literacyalberta.ca/promising-practices-guide-schematic
Metis Culture and Heritage Resource Centre http://www.metisresourcecentre.mb.ca/
Metis Nation of Alberta website for information and resources. http://www.albertametis.com/MNAHome/Home.aspx
Morgan, Deborah. 1992. Opening Doors: Thoughts and Experiences of Community Literacy Workers in Alberta. College Heights, Alberta: Parkland Colour Press.
Morgan, Deborah. 1997. Writing Out Loud. Edmonton, Alberta: Grassroots Press.
Morgan, Deborah, 2002. More Writing Loud. Edmonton, Alberta: Grassroots Press.
Morgan, Deborah, and Diana Twiss. 2010. The Little Project That Could: The Writing Out Loud Case Study. Camrose, Alberta: The Camrose Booster.
Steeves, Phyllis. 2003. “Cultural Genocide Practices: A Case Study of Canada’s Metis.” Master’s thesis. International Peace Studies, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Steeves, Phyllis. 2010. “Literacy: Genocide’s Silken Instrument. PhD Dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Virtual Museum of Metis History and Culture http://www.metismuseum.ca/exhibits/resources/
WriteForward Project. Bow Valley College. http://writeforward.ca/

Monday 10 February 2014

NINE PD DAYS. AND IN EDMONTON TO BOOT. HOW GOOD CAN IT BE?


I recently arrived back in Calgary from a nine day stint marking the written component of the ELA 30-1 Diploma Exam.  This year the college sent four English instructors to join around 80 of their colleagues from across the province to toil at in what I always regard as both essential professional development and a profound privilege.  The 8th and 9th floors of the Financial Building in downtown Edmonton is a familiar spot for many of us as who regularly coalesce with the 70,000 (give or take) final exam booklets.  These booklets, these prayers for marker kindness are - in all their beguiling individuality - rife with ideas (spanning the irrelevant to the illuminating) and, regardless of their depth and quality, are all valiant attempts by students to wax profoundly upon a writing topic provided.  Days later, instructors stagger home after reading hundreds upon hundreds of the Critical, Personal, Persuasive and, in all manners and degrees of mastery, exploratory written responses.   I know with certainty there isn’t one of us “assessors” who doesn’t smile tiredly in wonder at this remarkable opportunity.  This because we are actually blessed to enter into the creative and critical minds of Grade 12 Alberta students of all ages and backgrounds.  Most if not all of these student writers are seeking, under a decidedly challenging and time-constrained exam process, to write effectively and in turn start to realize their post-secondary plans.  Performing well on the English 30-1 or 30-2 final exam is a must for moving on.  To liberally quote just about any admission officer at any post-secondary institution, “The rest of your grades are okay but I need to know how you did in English?”

When the session is done, I blinker my way home to Calgary to fashion more fully in my mind some new perspective on this experience.  Here I’d like to reflect a little on why this particular professional development opportunity is, to my mind, so valuable for English instructors.  But first, just a quick bit on ELA “importance” through the eyes of the prompt.

THE JANUARY 2014 ELA 30-1 EXAM WRITING PROMPTS

In ELA 30-1, students were asked this year (as usual) to write two pieces, a Personal Response and a Critical Essay.  Year in and year out, the writing prompt has been the same for both the Personal and the Critical.  This year a change was made.  The Personal Response prompt was:  “How do significant events impact our ability to determine our destiny?”  The Critical Essay writing prompt had “kindness” substituted for “significant events” thereby narrowing the focus a little. (The next part is not as "quick")

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS HUMANIZES US

I have been asked, more than a few times, “Why in ($#&^@*$) is writing about something that seems so impractical as how kindness impacts our ability to determine our destiny important?   How is that going to help someone get or even keep a job?”  And more:  “People just need to learn specific skills.  They have to communicate clearly about what they do, for sure, but why about something as nebulous as kindness and destiny?"

Well, writing – the primary way of digging into and lending some actual shape to actual ideas -serves to solidify and aid us in our understanding in what we all know about and struggle with as human beings.  A full and even effective existence is made up of broad-reaching important concepts and the complex behaviours that define them.  It is very important to give some thought to not just what kindness or destiny might actually “be” in our lives but also to be asked in a serious moment of one’s life (an important final exam) to try communicating clearly about the wonderful and puzzling complexity of how we behave toward each other and what our path in life is or might be. All of us have faced “types” of kindness that can be both supportive and manipulative.  Most of us have been “cruel to be kind”, too.  Sometimes we use kindness to save ourselves from despair.  Does kindness even matter much when where we are heading is fixed in stone?  On and on the ideas around such a writing topic might and can go. 
 
English instructors love this stuff.  We also love assisting students in their taking a focused view of excellent writing.  Why not explore Hamlet from the standpoint of kindness?  Why not think about what this behaviour might actual do to a character’s personal abilities?  What does this all mean in terms of where any of the play’s characters are going in our lives?  Does kindness in some unique way alter or confirm what they individually define as their “Destiny?” 

Again, these speculations both in terms of ourselves and in terms of meaningful texts broaden our perspectives and perceptions of what it means to be a human being.  To nurture these thoughts can help us excel in communicating something of purpose in light of a great play, a novel or short story and can, by default, enlighten whatever life tasks all of us confront, relish and endure.  English instructors choose significant texts for their students that kindly enable these speculations.  We try to support and build the skills that allow students to synthesize their personal ideas in the light of these texts so that they can springboard with them to even more complex and critical investigations both with reference to literary art and also in their personal lives.  ELA instructors help students to build upon their proficiencies to interpret strong texts (for marks) and in doing so contribute to an environment within which they can better determine their individually-embraced postsecondary “destiny”.   Get or even keep a job?  What professional recruiter wouldn't want to consider hiring a thoughtful, personally reflective and critically engaged person? 

And so…

*To sit at a table with ELA practitioners for a sustained period of time immersed in the good, the bad, the ugly and the transcendentally beautiful ideas Alberta students endow for our humble and accurate assessment is at the bedrock of our practice.  There is no better way I know of becoming a reflective part of a provincial family of thinking people than to swim through and around their communicated mistakes, their shared creative insights, their unguarded and ill-conceived judgments and their confidently discerning spiritual understandings.  Instructors find themselves in a crucible of ideas that scream towards our very best practice.  We learn again and again what, why and how writing works or doesn't and we are able to sharpen our assessment skills in ways that are quite simply profound.  English Language Arts is vitally important and we come away from the marking sessions knowing with certainty why this is so.  Any good musician will tell you that practice, practice, practice is essential.  This is our best practice.*

WE ARE ACTUALLY ABLE TO QUANTIFY THE WRITTEN EXPRESSIONS OF THESE NEBULOUS THINGS

Some smiles early on.  That's Murray in the back.
We have the “bedsheet”.  This is just a homier way of saying Rubric.  For 9 days we all repeatedly refer to the large 11X17 “English Language Arts Scoring Categories and Scoring Criteria” as we plow, skip, swim, wade, drag and fly through exam after exam.  We read carefully the introductions, the body of the texts and the conclusions keeping in mind categories of Thought and Understanding, Supporting Evidence, Form and Structure, Matters of Choice and Matters of Correctness to assess within each of these categories if the student’s attempt is Excellent, Proficient, Satisfactory, Limited, Poor or, alas, Insufficient

This has been often described by even highly-experienced markers as “working with mercury”.   To grasp and confine this mercurial material, we break daily from the marking to face “Reliability Reviews”.  These are concocted by the few best and most experienced markers holding positions as “Standards Confirmers”.  They are forever on the lookout for student writing that will generate a broad range of assessment.  These are texts that might look ever-so persuasive in terms of textual evidence but really offer inaccurate support.  These tricky ones might appear subtle and distinctive but are, in fact, incomplete or merely plausible at best.   These samples texts come with a carefully crafted critical analysis to be revealed later.  The markers get the puzzle text, quietly grade it and then explain (hiding their nervousness) how their evaluations were made.  Then the “answer sheet” (a beautifully composed category-by-category analysis) comes out and we are kindly given a good dose of what it is to be “reliable” in our efforts to grade accurately. 

*This reliability process is, in itself, vital.  Instructors that experience this hothouse pd can not only be assured of their accurate assessment of our college’s own important Equivalency Exams but they can also use this hand’s on experience to shape ongoing English course development.  Through this process, we learn what is clearly required to meet and exceed each grading criteria; we can identify what writing obfuscations and misdirections can cleverly look like and, as a result, give us the intellectual pause to address these tendencies; and we can build our understandings of how missed or poorly-planned instructional opportunities actually serve to impact weak and/or generalized student writing.  We can shape within ourselves a deep and real understanding of how to encourage students to write with purpose and insight.    

Through these accumulative perceptions we can actually be reborn as instructors.  We can come away from this marking hothouse with vital understandings that can most-decidedly impact our ability to alter our student’s postsecondary destinies.  We can buttress our course construction with the valuable knowledge gained from these 9 long days in Edmonton and we can find new energy to approach our student’s essential English writing needs with the kindness that comes from real sensibility.*
_________________________________________________________________________________

“The Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing” (NCTE – National Council of Teachers of English) outlines the “Essential Habits of Mind” for writing that meets “college readiness”.   These “habits” keep peeking out at markers and become more and more real for instructors who read and read and read student attempts to realize them.  It is the repetitiveness of this busy place of assessment that confirms its value as the highest-level professional development.  Instructors do not just grow to re-know what they need to do to in terms of designing more effective learning and writing opportunities they also come face to face with all the old instructional demons.   From the Framework“Standardized writing curricula or assessment instruments that emphasize formulaic writing for nonauthentic audiences will not reinforce the habits of mind and the experiences necessary for success as students encounter the writing demands of postsecondary education.” 
_________________________________________________________________________________

What are these “habits of mind”, according to the NCTE? 

Curiosity, Openness, Engagement, Creativity, Persistence, Responsibility, Flexibility and Metacognition.

*Our marking attempt after attempt after attempt made by students to:  know more about their world, consider new ways of being, invest in their learning, use novel approaches, sustain their interest, take ownership, adapt to situations and to reflect open their own thinking actually does “reform” one’s professional understanding and commitment.* (For a lovely expansion along these lines see Michael Gaschnitz’s http://acfonthesamepage.blogspot.ca/2014/02/creativity-tools-not-light-bulbs.html)

WHAT STUDENTS WROTE

To close, I thought I would share just a few of the remarkable controlling ideas (or thesis statements) offered by some of the student papers that caught my eye.  Remember the writing prompt? 

“How does kindness impact our ability to determine our destiny?” 

 “When an individual neglects kindness, assuming that it will not better his destiny, it will trigger a lifestyle of materialistic, shallow, egocentric habits resulting in nothing worth living for.”

“When attempting to discover one’s own true destiny, unclouded by the influence of others, an individual must recollect on their past treatment of peers and decide whether or not they truly deserve to know their own destiny.”

“The belief that a person’s path in life is predetermined is only an excuse.  The truth about destiny is that an individual is able to decide upon their fate based on their actions.  Kindness, itself, specifically kindness to and from others, plays a minimal role in determining one’s destiny.  Kindness takes a back seat to ability and effort.”

“It is better to be kind than right” is true, but it can only go so far.  When it interferes with destiny one must be willing to make themselves a priority instead of the happiness of others.  Excessive kindness permits others to force their desires on to an individual, diverting them from their true course.  Achieving one’s dreams and destiny is a possibility only when one doesn’t permit kindness to interfere.“

“When an individual is kind in nature, they often allow their destiny to be chosen for them and let others be happier.”

“Kindness to others can only serve to create ‘issues’”.

“The simple act of kindness can mean the world to an individual faced with a personal struggle.  The most meaningful gifts are not wrapped in paper or made of plastic.”

*What a privilege.*
Murray Ronaghan

Saturday 8 February 2014

Appreciating diversity... understanding difference... and grasping the cost of bullying



Shane Koyczan - Beat Poet

By an odd set of circumstances this amazing Canadian beat poet has entered my life in the past couple of days. On Friday I was talking with a student who briefly opened up and shared a story of bullying, dropping out of school and now coming back to BVC. The student commented on the incredible support and acceptance they found with us. When I asked what motivated them to return, the student said that a poet called "Shane something" had a poem on pork chops and karate chops that described "what happened to me perfectly".  I made a mental note to track down the poet from those scant clues.

Also on Friday, I picked up my kids and on the way back from pho, my son starts to get very excited about a poet that he is studying in ELA 20-2. This is a kid that rarely gets excited about anything and very rarely about anything having to do with school. He asked for my phone, found a YouTube video and played it over the car's audio system as we drove home.  The poem was "To This Day" by poet Shane Koyczan.  In the poem is the line about pork chops and karate chops... the SAME day I had two encounters with the same poet from two different people.

The more I listened to the beat poetry the more I was touched deeply by what he had to say.  Here are two links to examples of his work:

  • To This Day  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltun92DfnPY
  • The Crickets have Arthritis   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEdialVpVvM
I wonder what opportunities we have for this Canadian poet's work to become part of our curriculum. Clearly it speaks to important contemporary topics in a powerful way.